Skip to content

GGB · Evidence room Consented evidence · classified record

Track record

Results, measured — not claimed.

One engagement is published below with written consent and exact figures. Around it sits the founder's classified track record and the discipline every result is measured by. Premium engagements stay confidential — evidence first, method second.

Consented Named Outcome Parco Group · Jebel Ali, Dubai

Food cost cut from 44% to 29%; average daily sales rose from AED 6,000 to AED 14,000.

At Parco Group's Jebel Ali operation, food cost was running at 44% — margin lost on every cover. Over a 120-day reset, GGB rebuilt purchasing, portioning, menu pricing and waste control and brought food cost to 29%. With margin under control, the focus moved to the top line: across nine months, average daily sales rose from AED 6,000 to AED 14,000 — the same kitchen and team, under disciplined P&L control.

“Highly recommended, we have signed retainership for all our restaurants including Parco, Sameer, Rolls and Tea, Nakshatra and others.”

Abdul Haseeb · Executive Director, Parco Group

Past result, documented and published with written consent — not a promise.

Food cost

44% 29%

−15 pts over 120 days

Average daily sales

AED 6,000 AED 14,000

+133% over 9 months

Read the full Parco Group case study →

The intervention, in sequence

  1. Day 0 · diagnostic

    Food cost read at 44% — margin lost on every cover, outlet by outlet.

  2. 120-day reset

    Purchasing, portioning, menu pricing and waste control rebuilt — food cost brought to 29%.

  3. Months 3–9 · under control

    With margin held, focus moved to the top line: average daily sales rose from AED 6,000 to AED 14,000 — same kitchen, same team.

Purchasing

Supplier terms and order discipline rebuilt against theoretical cost.

Portioning

Yield and plate spec enforced so the menu costs what it says.

Menu pricing

Every item re-priced against real cost and channel economics.

Waste control

Variance tracked daily — drift caught in days, not at month-end.

Founder Track Record

P. Dayaparan

People buy the founder, not a logo. This is track record, not a client outcome — consented, checkable facts about the experience the work is led from, judged from the P&L, not the brochure.

28+ years
in F&B and hospitality operations across the GCC, India and Singapore — launches, turnarounds and multi-outlet control.
45+ F&B concepts
developed and launched, within 300+ project engagements across the career — the scope behind the method.
PMP-certified
Project Management Professional — engagements run to a documented, auditable standard.
Branded-resort operations
senior operating background at a branded-resort group — institutional-grade discipline.

How to read our proof

Every claim, classified.

Serious buyers do not want louder claims; they want to know exactly what each one rests on. So every piece of proof on this site carries its type and rigour — from a named, consented outcome to a clearly-labelled worked example. Nothing is dressed up as more than it is.

  1. Consented Named Outcome

    A real, named client engagement with measured figures, published only with the client’s written consent. The highest bar — name, numbers and context all on the record.

  2. Anonymised Method-Case

    A real engagement shown without the client name or any identifying detail — the shape of the work and the result, drawn from a closed engagement. Never a fabricated number.

  3. Method-Proof · Worked Example

    The method demonstrated on a fully-worked, clearly-labelled sample. Every figure is derived by a fixture-gated engine from sample inputs — it proves the instrument, not a client outcome.

  4. Founder Track Record

    Verifiable facts about the founder’s career — track record, not a client outcome. Only consented, checkable specifics: years, credentials, branded-resort operations.

Anonymised Method-Cases

How the work goes — without naming the client.

Most engagements are confidential. Rather than invent numbers, we show the shape of the work — diagnostic, intervention, the control we install, and the kind of result it produces. The exact figures are surfaced only once a client clears anonymisation.

Anonymised Method-Case Reserved · pending owner-cleared anonymisation

Multi-outlet margin turnaround

  1. Diagnostic

    A Profit Leak Audit ranks where margin is leaking — food cost, labour, rent and delivery commission — biggest leak first.

  2. Intervention

    Purchasing, portioning, menu pricing and waste control rebuilt against the prime-cost ceiling.

  3. Control installed

    A daily head-office reporting cadence installed so the recovered margin is held, not lost again at month-end.

  4. Result shape

    Result shape: food cost recovered toward the prime-cost ceiling and held under control — the exact figures shown only once a client clears anonymisation.

Anonymised Method-Case Reserved · pending owner-cleared anonymisation

Head-office control for a scaling group

  1. Diagnostic

    An HO Control and Tech Stack read finds where multi-outlet visibility breaks and decisions lag the data.

  2. Intervention

    POS, stock, accounting and approvals consolidated toward a single source of truth with a real-time reporting layer.

  3. Control installed

    Standardised KPIs and digital approvals installed so head office can see and steer every outlet from one screen.

  4. Result shape

    Result shape: decision latency cut from weekly/monthly to near-real-time — the exact figures shown only once a client clears anonymisation.

In preparation

Documented with consent — in preparation

Clearance recorded. Anonymised figures are being compiled — this folder publishes only when the numbers are real.

In preparation

Documented with consent — in preparation

Clearance recorded. Anonymised figures are being compiled — this folder publishes only when the numbers are real.

How we measure

Every engagement, held to four numbers.

No vanity metrics. The work is judged on the lines that actually move a restaurant's P&L — and on the time and capital each change takes to return.

Food cost %

Theoretical vs actual, by item and by outlet — usually the fastest margin to recover.

Labour vs sales

Productivity per shift measured against revenue, not a blanket headcount cut.

Delivery economics

Channel mix and menu pricing rebuilt around real aggregator commission.

Payback

Every intervention measured against the capital and the time it takes to return.

Where we work

A region we know on the ground.

Dubai-based. Operating across the UAE and wider GCC, India and Singapore. Founder-led work close enough to sit in the kitchen, broad enough to build a brand that travels.

  • UAE / wider GCC

    Home market — Dubai and Abu Dhabi, extending across the wider Gulf including Oman: launches, turnarounds and multi-outlet control.

  • India

    High-growth corridor — franchise systems and cloud-kitchen economics for scaling brands.

  • Singapore

    South-East Asia hub — premium concepts, franchise readiness and head-office discipline.

The instrument

The number, on every outlet, every day.

Proof isn't only the outcome — it's the discipline that produces it. The GGB HO Control System puts food cost, labour, prime cost and margin in front of head office across every branch, so a drift is caught in days, not at month-end.

GGB HO Control System
Illustrative interface

Food cost

31%

Labour

27%

Prime cost

58%

Net margin

12%

By outlet

  • Outlet 01 Food 30%
  • Outlet 02 Food 34%
  • Outlet 03 Food 38%

Illustrative — your outlets' live data populates this view. Typical industry ranges shown.

Discuss the evidence WhatsApp GGB